Get involved: Asheville, Buncombe leaders to discuss future of I-26 Connector

billboard_i26connectorThe Buncombe County board of commissioners and Asheville City Council will consider this resolution related to the I-26 Connector on March 18 (commissioners) and on March 25 (city council).

The Alliance is encouraging community members to attend to learn more and to comment on  this critical project and its impact on the region.

The I-26 ConnectUs Project is made up of representatives from the Asheville neighborhoods that stand to be most impacted by the I-26 Connector Project, including West Asheville, Burton Street, and Montford. The group is convened by the Western North Carolina Alliance.

We have been working together since 2009. All participants agree that the unfinished portion of I-26 as it passes through Buncombe County should be completed in a timely way.

The I-26 ConnectUs Project members are unable to support the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (DOT) request for the City of Asheville and Buncombe County to endorse an alternative for Section B of the I-26 Connector Project at this time. We recognize that the new, state level funding prioritization process is underway and that the project may rank higher in that process if the least expensive alternative is analyzed.

However, we believe it is premature to ask the City and County to endorse an alternative prior to the completion of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and a full understanding of the relative impacts and benefits of each alternative. Endorsing the least expensive alternative at this point, even for the limited purpose of prioritization, creates a very real risk that our community will be locked into that alternative in the future even if the EIS reveals another alternative is more beneficial.

If, however, adoption of a resolution in support of the least expensive alternative, Alternative 3C, is the best way to ensure that the project remains viable, we ask that the City and County be mindful of the following issues:

  • That Alternative 3C, as currently designed, does not meet the City’s long range plans
  • That the resolution is for the limited purposes of prioritization and does not reflect an endorsement of a final alternative, which will be made only after completion of the EIS and public hearings;
  • That the EIS should include infrastructure for bicycles and pedestrians in all alternatives, consistent with the City of Asheville’s master plans;
  • That the City and County work with DOT to create benefits for those communities that stand to be impacted the most by this project;
  • That if a final, preferred alternative is selected that does not remove highway traffic from the Jeff Bowen Bridges, that the City and County advocate for a new project that would allow Patton Avenue and the bridges to become a continuous boulevard from West Asheville into downtown; and
  • That the City and County continue seeking to work with DOT and the Federal Highway Administration to identify options to reduce the footprint of the project, including utilizing design exceptions and context sensitive design, and conducting a new traffic study.

Commissioners meet  at 4:30 p.m. in Commission Chambers, 200 College St., Suite 326, in downtown Asheville. For more information, call the clerk at 250-4105 or email at kathy.hughes@buncombecounty.org.

City Council meetings are at 5 p.m. in the Council Chamber, located on the second floor of City Hall, 70 Court Plaza, in downtown Asheville. Contact City Clerk Maggie Burleson at mburleson@ashevillenc.gov if you have questions.

 

Duke Energy outlines coal ash strategy in Asheville, across N.C.

asheville-coal-plant

Duke Energy’s coal-fired plant at Lake Julian in Asheville.

Lynn Good, Duke Energy’s CEO has sent a letter to Gov. Pat McCrory that outlines Duke Energy’s coal ash management strategy across North Carolina, including the Asheville Plant.

In the letter, Good says Duke will “continue moving ash from the Asheville plant to a lined structural fill solution,” and “convert the three remaining North Carolina units (Cliffside 5 and both Asheville units) or retire the units.

“We need binding commitments from Duke, not just words, said Frank Holleman, senior attorney at the SELC, which represents citizens groups suing Duke Energy, along with DENR, to correct federal and state clean-water violations.

“It is good that Duke says it will remove the ash from Riverbend and Dan River, but all 14 communities in North Carolina threatened by its coal ash need binding commitments that Duke Energy will obey the law and clean up its coal ash,” Holleman said.

Recent coal ash news:

DENR rejects Duke’s coal ash plan, amid accusations of leniency-News & Observer

Duke Energy, N.C. too cozy over ash? News & Record

Duke Energy offers coal ash removal plan; DENR calls pan “inadequate”-Time Warner News

Duke Energy vague on future of NC coal ash ponds-WRAL

Poll: Voters think Duke Energy should pay for clean-up, not customers-Chapelboro

NC Democrats to push bill to move all coal ash-WCNC

Internal emails show Duke Energy, DENR negotiating coal ash clean up-WRAL

Paging Duke Energy: SC electric company reuses 80 pct. of coal ash-WCNC

Judge rules Duke must take immediate action to eliminate sources of groundwater contamination at ash ponds

asheville-coal-plant

Duke Energy’s coal-fired plant sits near Lake Julian.

Press Release from the Southern Environmental Law Center

For Release:  March 6, 2014

Contacts:

SELC, Kathleen Sullivan 919-945-7106 or ksullivan@selcnc.org<mailto:ksullivan@selcnc.org>

Representing:

Cape Fear River Watch, Kemp Burdette, kemp@cfrw.us<mailto:kemp@cfrw.us>, 910-762-5606

Sierra Club, Kelly Martin, 828-423-7845

Waterkeeper Alliance, Pete Harrison, 828-582-0422, pharrison@waterkeeper.org<mailto:pharrison@waterkeeper.org>

WNCA, Hartwell Carson, 828-258- 8737

CHAPEL HILL, N.C.—A Wake County Judge today ruled that Duke Energy must take immediate action to eliminate the sources of groundwater contamination that are currently violating water quality standards at all 14 of its coal-fired power plants in North Carolina.

The ruling comes in the wake of recent claims by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) that it lacks the legal authority to require cleanup of the ash ponds which hold millions of gallons of toxic coal ash.  DENR’s comments were made in response to the February 2014 coal ash spill that dumped up to 35,000 tons of coal ash into the Dan River.

“The ruling leaves no doubt, Duke Energy is past due on its obligation to eliminate the sources of groundwater contamination, its unlined coal ash pits, and the State has both the authority and a duty to require action now,” said D.J. Gerken, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center who represented the conservation groups in the case.  “This ruling enforces a common-sense requirement in existing law – before you can clean up contaminated groundwater, you first must stop the source of the contamination- in this case, Duke’s unlined coal ash pits.”

Data collected by DENR over several years indicates that many of Duke’s coal-fired power plants are causing groundwater contamination by storing hazardous coal ash in unlined pits often adjacent to major bodies of water, including drinking water reservoirs.  The state has asserted however that it can take no action without first determining how far contamination has spread and that it lacks the legal power to require Duke to remove ash from the ponds.  Today’s ruling clarifies the State’s authority under the North Carolina groundwater protection law to require Duke to stop the ponds from further contaminating groundwater, before it tackles the long term challenge of cleaning up the groundwater it has already polluted.

“Duke’s toxic legacy in North Carolina needs to end, and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources won’t do its part to protect our water,” said Kelly Martin, senior campaign representative with Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign. “Clean water is our right, and if Duke Energy won’t do the right thing even after the Dan River coal ash spill, we’ll keep fighting to hold them accountable.”

Although almost all of the unlined coal ash ponds in the state have been in operation for decades– some for as many as fifty years–the ponds went largely unregulated until December 22, 2008 when a dam burst at the TVA Kingston Fossil Plant causing the largest coal ash spill in the history of the United States.  The February 2014 spill on the Dan River was reportedly the nation’s third largest coal ash spill, coating the Dan River with some 70 miles of toxic ash.

“Arsenic has been detected at levels exceeding legal standards in the groundwater at the Dan River plant at every sampling event since January 2011,” said Pete Harrison with the Waterkeeper Alliance.  “If the state had exercised its authority to require cleanup of those ponds previously, the catastrophic February 2014 coal ash spill could have been prevented.  The time to use this authority to require cleanup at other plants around the state is now, before another disaster occurs.”

Lawsuits filed by DENR earlier this year against each coal-fired power plant in the state allege that Duke Energy is violating state groundwater standards with contamination at several of its plants.  Those violations include thallium at the Asheville plant near the French Broad River and arsenic and selenium at the L.V. Sutton plant on the Cape Fear river.  Groundwater contamination at both facilities has been shown to be spreading towards local communities and water resources.   Duke has already been forced to buy out neighboring property because of contaminated groundwater and to supply alternate drinking sources to nearby homeowners at several of its plants – but has not yet stopped the source of the contamination.

“To effectively address contamination, you have to address the cause of that contamination,” said French Broad Riverkeeper Hartwell Carson. “Bailing water out of a boat with a hole in it doesn’t do you any good; you’ve got to fix the hole first. Today’s ruling means Duke will have to address the source of the thallium contamination in Asheville that is spreading toward our neighborhoods and river.”

Conservation groups are hopeful that the ruling will move the state to use its authority to require that the ash be removed from the ponds and stored in dry, lined landfills.  The ruling comes as Duke ceases coal-burning operations at several plants and prepares closure plans for the aging coal ash ponds.  The L.V. Sutton plant in Wilmington is among those plants which has converted to natural gas in lieu of coal.

“It would be a disaster to allow Duke to leave the coal ash ponds at the Sutton plant in place as it converts to natural gas,” said Cape Fear Riverkeeper Kemp Burdette.  “The ponds have already caused decades of contamination, leaching selenium and other dangerous contaminants into our groundwater and river to the point the community can no longer utilize the groundwater resources in a 17-square mile area because it is too contaminated.  If Duke closes the Sutton plant and leaves the ash in place it is the citizens that will bear the cost – it’s time for the state to require Duke to remove the ash.”

 

###

About Southern Environmental Law Center

The Southern Environmental Law Center is a regional nonprofit using the power of the law to protect the health and environment of the Southeast (Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama). Founded in 1986, SELC’s team of more than 50 legal and policy experts represent more than 100 partner groups on issues of climate change and energy, air and water quality, forests, the coast and wetlands, transportation, and land use.

WEB: www.SouthernEnvironment.orghttp://www.twitter.com/selc_org<http://www.SouthernEnvironment.orghttp:/www.twitter.com/selc_org>

About Sierra Club

The Sierra Club is America’s largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization, with more than 1.4 million members and supporters nationwide. The Sierra Club works to to safeguard the health of our communities, protect wildlife, and preserve our remaining wild places through grassroots activism, public education, lobbying and litigation.

Visit us on the web at www.sierraclub.org<http://www.sierraclub.org> and follow us on Twitter at @sierra_club.

About Waterkeeper Alliance

Waterkeeper Alliance unites more than 200 Waterkeeper organizations that are on the front lines of the global water crisis patrolling and protecting more than 1.5 million square miles of rivers, lakes and coastlines in the Americas, Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa. Waterkeepers emphasize citizen advocacy to defend the fundamental human right to swimmable, drinkable, and fishable waters, and combine firsthand knowledge of their waterways with an unwavering commitment to the rights of their communities and to the rule of law.

About WNCA

For more than 30 years, the Western North Carolina Alliance has been a trusted community partner, marshaling grassroots support to keep our forests healthy, our air and water clean, and our communities vibrant. WNCA empowers citizens to be advocates for livable communities and the natural environment of Western North Carolina.

www.wnca.org<http://www.wnca.org>

https://twitter.com/wnca

About the Cape Fear Riverkeeper

Cape Fear River Watch was founded in 1993 and began as a nonprofit organization, open to everyone, dedicated to the improvement and preservation of the health, beauty, cleanliness, and heritage of the Cape Fear River Basin. CFRW’s mission is to “protect and improve the water quality of the Lower Cape Fear River Basin through education, advocacy and action.” CFRW supports the work of the Cape Fear RIVERKEEPER, a member of the WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE.

www.capefearriverwatch.org<http://www.capefearriverwatch.org>

 

 

 

 

What’s next for Asheville’s water?

The Asheville watershed

The Asheville watershed

Join us for a forum set for 6 p.m. March 17 in Pack Library’s Lord Auditorium. The focus will be on the status of Asheville’s lawsuit, and other issues affecting the future.
Speakers include:
  • Mayor Esther Manheimer, City of Asheville
  • Katie Hicks, Clean Water for North Carolina
  • Barry Summers, SaveOurWaterWNC

WNCA news and updates on the Hominy Creek oil spill

Below is a summary of our French Broad Riverkeeper’s work and observations about the oil spill at Hominy Creek on Feb. 14. WNCA has gathered information on how you can help us stop this type on incident from happening again.

What You Can Do:
Current state law requires the responsible party of a spill (oil, sewage, etc) to notify the public within 24 hours. The state then has 48 hours to notify the public. This law needs to change to ensure the state is notified immediately and that the public is also notified immediately. 

Contact your legislator and let them know we want them to act on this issue:

There must be better communication from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to the public. DENR should use existing technology (Twitter, Facebook, email, etc.) to notify the public and impacted municipalities immediately. Also, additional oil storage facilities should be inspected to make sure they are properly constructed and maintained to prevent future spills. 

Contact DENR to let them know oil facilities should all be inspected and that the public needs good timely information to protect human health and the environment.

      • Drew Elliot, public information officer, drew.elliot@ncdenr.gov or (919) 707-8619
      • Mitch Gillespie, assistant secretary of the environment: mitch.gillespie@ncdenr.gov or (919) 707-8619

_______________

Video: French Broad Riverkeeper Hartwell Carson got an update Feb. 16 about the Hominy Creek oil spill from EPA emergency response coordinator Terry Stillman. Stillman shared information on the cleanup effort and what the community can expect over the coming days and weeks.

French Broad Riverkeeper’s summary of events surrounding the Hominy Creek oil spill:

At about 1:30 p.m. on Friday Feb. 14, workers at the Vulcan Materials Co., noticed oil running through their property.

Oil bubbling out of the sediment when stirred up.

Oil bubbling out of the sediment when stirred up.

They quickly built berms and basins to try to prevent the oil from entering Hominy Creek, which dissects Vulcan’s quarry. Workers at the quarry notified Harrison Construction Co., that the spill originated from the company’s 20,000 gallon fuel oil tank, which was leaking.

Harrison Construction reported there were 5,800 gallons in the tank at the time of the release, and about 5,000 escaped the tank. A portion of that oil was captured on site before entering Hominy Creek. The oil leaked from the tank when a coupling failed. The concrete containment system, that is required by law, also failed, because the drain valve was left open. The drain valve is used to drain rain water, but is supposed to remain closed in the event of a spill.

The Feb. 17 edition of the Asheville Citizen-Times quoted Harrison Construction President Todd Quigg as saying he “does not know whether human or mechanical error, or a combination, is to blame for allowing diesel fuel leaking from a tank to escape a secondary containment system and get into Hominy Creek through a storm water runoff pipe.”

EricHartwellStillman

WNCA’s French Broad RiverkeeperHartwell Carson and Asheville Greenworks’ Volunteer/Clean Communities Coordinator Eric Bradford talk on scene with EPA Emergency Response staff.

NEO Corp., an environmental remediation company, was on the site shortly after the spill and began to use a vacuum truck to remove oil that had pooled up on the site. Around 3 p.m., as required by law, Harrison Construction called the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to report the spill.

Harrison Construction reported that the spill was contained, and it was not until additional calls were made by the public that the local fire department, then DENR, and then EPA from Atlanta responded.

It is still unclear why the spill was reported as contained and what DENR did to investigate the original call.

The Buncombe County Fire Marshal surveyed the river Friday at about 6:30 p.m., finding oil as far downstream as East Oakview Road. He instructed the company to place oil absorbent booms at Hominy Creek Road, downstream where they observed oil in the creek. No booms were placed in the river prior to the fire marshal’s instructions. It is still unclear why Harrison Construction did not try to remediate the oil in the creek, prior to instructions from the fire marshal. DENR arrived on the scene sometime after 6 p.m., and EPA arrived a few hours after that. Oil absorbent booms were placed in the river that afternoon and evening. Booms were placed overnight and based on what was visible Friday it was believed the spill had not reached the French Broad River. The spill was reported in the media by WLOS TV at  9 p.m. on Friday night, but it was reported as being contained.

Local photographer Bill Rhodes noticed the spill on Saturday morning, at the spot where Sand Hill Road crosses Hominy Creek, near Biltmore Lake. Rhodes also saw that the oil at Hominy Creek Park was entering the French Broad River and a few miles down the French Broad River at French Broad River Park.

Rhodes called the fire department, and crews then installed additional booms across Hominy Creek, just before it enters the French Broad River. WNCA French Broad Riverkeeper Hartwell Carson and Eric Bradford of Asheville Greenworks saw and reported lots of oil visible on the river at about noon on Saturday.

morebooms

EPA and the hired cleanup contractor, ERC, put oil absorbent pads in the eddy where oil gathered on Pond Road. The original oil boom is visible with the hard plastic boom that was added Feb. 15.

Booms were also added in a few other locations along Hominy Creek on Saturday, and Saturday night additional hard plastic booms were added to support the soft absorbent booms.

As of Tuesday afternoon (Feb. 18), a lot of oil remained in all parts of Hominy Creek. The fuel oil smell was still heavy, and there was sheen and some product visible in the water

EPA and DENR both say it will take some time before all of the oil sheen is gone from the creek.

DENR has taken water samples to investigate the impact of the spill and WNCA will be watching the spill, cleanup, enforcement and impact to the river closely to fully understand what went wrong, what impact there is to the river, and what can be done better in the future to make sure this type of incident does not happen again.

Feb 19: Five days after the Hominy Creek oil spill, you can still smell fuel at the creek. Our French Broad Riverkeeper reports that as many as five hours passed before cleanup crews took measures to protect area rivers. Click here to view the story.

Feb. 25: Asheville Fire Chief Scott Burnette releases a PowerPoint updated on the Hominy Creek oil spill. See it here.

Feb. 26: From the Asheville Citizen-Times:  “State environmental officials issued a notice of violation to the company blamed for spilling thousands of gallons of fuel oil and contaminating Hominy Creek. Harrison Construction Co. faces fines of up to $25,000 per day for each of three violations cited in the notice, said Chuck Cranford of the N.C. Division of Water Resources. Meanwhile, Cranford said cleanup efforts to contain the fuel spilled on Feb. 14 have concluded and the creek appears to be free of contaminants.”

 

 

BREAKING: Federal government investigates coal ash spill

From the Charlotte Observer:

‘Grand jury investigates coal ash spill’

Posted: Thursday, Feb. 13, 2014

A federal grand jury has subpoenaed the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources for records on Duke Energy’s coal ash spill on the Dan River.

The subpoena, dated Monday, comes from the U.S. District Court for Eastern North Carolina in Raleigh. It seeks a wide range of documents, photographs, reports and drawings for “an official criminal investigation being conducted by a federal grand jury.”

“The only thing I can say is that we will cooperate with the subpoena,” said DENR spokesman Drew Elliot.

Read more HERE.