Hendersonville Green Drinks: The Path Toward a Cleaner, Safer and More Affordable Energy Future

Hendersonville Green Drinks: The Path Toward a Cleaner, Safer and More Affordable Energy Future

MountainTrue Campaigns Director Joan Walker is the featured presenter of the next Hendersonville Green Drinks on Thursday, January 14 at Black Bear Coffee in downtown Hendersonville.

JoanHeadshotJuly2012_2New time and place!
What: Hendersonville Green Drinks
Where: Black Bear Coffee, 318 N. Main St., Hendersonville
When: January 14, 2016. Come at 5:30 pm for networking; discussion starts at 6:00 pm.

Attendees will learn about the current state of Duke Energy’s Western Carolinas Modernization project, and ongoing efforts by MountainTrue and the Carolina Land Coalition to ensure that Duke prioritizes energy efficiency and renewable infrastructure and reduces its reliance on fossil fuels. Walker will also discuss ways that area residents and businesses can work together to reduce demand for electricity and avoid a third gas-fired unit proposed by Duke.

Come to Green Drinks to learn more about current environmental issues, have relevant discussions, and meet up with like-minded people. Everyone is welcome. You don’t have to drink at Green Drinks, just come and listen. Black Bear Coffee offers beer, wine, coffee drinks and sodas. A limited food menu will be available. For more information about Hendersonville’s Green Drinks, contact Joan Walker, Campaigns Director for MountainTrue at 828.258.8737 x 205, or joan@mountaintrue.org.

 

Environmental Groups File to Intervene on Duke Energy’s Proposed New Gas Plant

Environmental Groups File to Intervene on Duke Energy’s Proposed New Gas Plant

Contact:
Kelly Martin, Sierra Club, (828-423-7845)
Julie Mayfield, MountainTrue (828-271-4544)
DJ Gerken, SELC (828-337-2238)

Asheville, N.C. — MountainTrue and the Sierra Club, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), today filed a petition to intervene in proceeding before the North Carolina Utilities Commission regarding Duke Energy’s proposed new gas-fired power plant that the company has branded its “Western Carolinas Modernization Project.”

Download the petition (pdf)

Duke Energy Progress, whose service territory includes Asheville and other parts of Western North Carolina, submitted to the Utilities Commission on December 16 a notification of intent to file an application for a “certificate of public convenience and necessity” for the new gas units that, if approved, would replace a coal-fired plant at Lake Julian, south of Asheville that is slated for retirement in 2020.

In its letter to the Commission, Duke Energy Progress stated its intent to seek approval of two new natural gas-fired 280 MW units, as well as a third 192 MW unit designed to meet additional demand during peak times. Duke has stated that the ‘peaking” unit may not need to be built if the company can meet demand through energy efficiency programs and greater use of renewable technologies. Duke is currently in discussions with the City of Asheville and Buncombe County, MountainTrue and the Sierra Club to develop those alternatives.

MountainTrue and the Sierra Club, represented by SELC, are requesting to intervene in the proceeding to ensure that the proposed gas plant is truly needed to provide power to Duke’s customers in Western NC, as required under state law, and that the company maximizes its use of cleaner, cost-effective alternatives such as energy efficiency and renewable energy.

Kelly Martin, senior campaign representative for the Beyond Coal campaign in North Carolina, said:

“Duke’s stated intent, albeit qualified, to build a 192 MW peaking gas unit looks like a bet against the success of the recently established Community Clean Energy Policy Framework—a community partnership to achieve demand reductions through energy efficiency measures. That framework, as Duke has publicly stated, ‘involves substantive conversations with the city and other stakeholders about ways to increase renewable energy, energy efficiency and evolving technologies here locally.’

“We therefore encourage Duke to postpone seeking approval for a gas peaker unit in Asheville, and urge the company to include a specific financial commitment to measurable energy efficiency goals as part of the Modernization Project Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity application.

“Taking these two steps will go a long way toward retaining and building confidence in the community partnership on reducing energy use.”

Julie Mayfield, co-director of MountainTrue, said:

“The inclusion of the 192 MW peaking plant in this filing is unfortunate. Duke has told the public that they are looking for cleaner alternatives, then they turn around and ask the public utilities commission for permission to build the additional unit seven years before they say it might be necessary.

“We believe in the commitment of the local Duke officials to this process, but it seems that one hand may not know what the other is doing. We want Duke to be all in on seeking alternatives to the third unit instead of building in a back door, and we are asking them to send a clear message that they are fully committed to finding cleaner, sustainable alternatives by removing the peaking unit from their filing to the utilities commission.”

D.J. Gerken, Managing Attorney, Asheville Office of the Southern Environmental Law Center, said:

“In 2015 the General Assembly gave Duke a fast track for review of this proposal – but not a free pass to overbuild its new fossil fuel plant and stick its customers with the bill.  Duke needs to make a real commitment to renewable energy and energy efficiency in the mountains and put up data to prove that it needs this expansion.

“I am especially skeptical of Duke’s request for up-front approval to build a 190 MW peaking unit it would not need until 2023, if ever, when the Company said just two months ago it was working to avoid the third unit with new investments in energy efficiency.”

The application for approval could be filed as soon as January 15, 2016. A public hearing is set for 7:00 p.m. on January 26 at the Buncombe County Courthouse, and a decision by the Utilities Commission must be made within 45 days from the of the filing, or as soon as February 29, 2016.

###

Carolina Land Coalition Carries On!

Carolina Land Coalition Carries On!

Last week a group of Carolina Land Coalition leaders met and unanimously agreed that the Carolina Land Coalition will continue to protect our land from Duke Energy’s long-term plans. We dodged a bullet when the transmission lines and substations were cancelled, but WNC will stay in the crosshairs as long as our region’s largest utility continues to prioritize fossil fuels to meet our growing demand.

Energy efficiency and renewable energy are realistic, affordable and attainable solutions. These are technologies that create more jobs, help lower utility bills and will keep our air, water and land clean and safe from more power plants and transmission lines in the future. MountainTrue and Carolina Land Coalition are committed to promoting those common sense solutions in partnership with local communities, organizations, governments and, yes, Duke Energy. Compared to the sprint we did together this summer fighting the “modernization” plan, this will be a marathon. We hope you’ll stay with us as we plan and implement this next phase of work!  If you’re interested in playing an active leadership role in the Coalition moving forward please email Joan Walker, MountainTrue’s Campaign Coordinator at joan@mountaintrue.org

In the near term, we’re still waiting to see what Duke Energy does next in regards to improvements to existing lines and the new gas plant. When the plan for the new plant is released after the new year, we’ll analyze it and support folks in making public comments to get the very best plan possible. The process for line upgrades is less clear at this point, but we’re doing our best to find out what kind of information Duke is required to share with the public and how the public can give their input.

Stay tuned to the website at www.CarolinaLandCoalition.org for updates, a new vision statement and more. I hope you’ll remain and get even more involved as we move toward a truly modern energy future for our beautiful mountains and communities!

Show your support! Join Carolina Land Coalition and receive updates and action opportunities!

Conservation and Recreation Coalition Announces Recommendations for Nantahala-Pisgah National Forests

Conservation and Recreation Coalition Announces Recommendations for Nantahala-Pisgah National Forests

(SYLVA, NC)—A coalition of conservation and recreation organizations recommends more trails and better public access as well as backcountry and wild areas for the Nantahala-Pisgah National Forests, according to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) developed by the coalition. The coalition is submitting the MOU to the U.S. Forest Service as part of the ongoing forest plan revision process for the Nantahala-Pisgah National Forests.

The coalition includes Access Fund, American Alpine Club, American Whitewater, Back Country Horsemen of America, Back Country Horsemen of Blue Ridge, Back Country Horsemen of North Carolina, Back Country Horsemen of Pisgah, Back Country Horsemen of Western North Carolina, Black Dome Mountain Sports, Blue Ridge Outdoors Magazine, Carolina Adventure Guides, Carolina Climbers Coalition, Franklin Bird Club, Friends of Big Ivy, Ground Up Publishing, Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust, Highlands Plateau Audubon Society, Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition, International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA), MountainTrue, Nantahala Area Southern Off-Road Biking Association (SORBA), Nantahala Hiking Club, North Carolina Horse Council, Northwest North Carolina Mountain Bike Alliance, Outdoor 76, Outdoor Alliance, Pisgah Area SORBA, Pisgah Mountain Bike Adventures, Southern Appalachian Plant Society, Southern Appalachian Wilderness Stewards (SAWS), Stay and Play in the Smokies, The Wilderness Society, Trout Unlimited – Unaka Chapter, and Wild South.

The idea driving the coalition is simple: Western North Carolina’s national forests are the region’s greatest public asset, and should be protected for their inherent beauty, biodiversity, and their many values. Recognizing that Nantahala-Pisgah National Forest is in the top three most visited national forests in the United States, the proposal acknowledges the economic importance of these forests for recreation and tourism, and recommends management of these assets in a responsible manner that is both environmentally and economically sound. The management and designations proposed by the coalition extend stronger protections to more than 365,000 of the national forest’s nearly 1.1 million acres including two new National Recreation Areas and more than 109,000 acres of recommended wilderness.

Key recommendations within the proposal:

  • Two new National Recreation Areas for Western North Carolina: a 115,573-acre Pisgah National Recreation Area and a 57,400-acre Grandfather National Recreation Area that will protect these areas from resource extraction and ensure that their unique natural beauty and ecological diversity are maintained for future generations, while recreation use such as hiking, mountain biking, horseback riding, hunting, fishing, kayaking, and climbing is planned and managed for as a long-term priority. National Recreation Areas will formalize recreation access in key points of our forests, and would allow for the establishment of sustainable infrastructure to prevent damage to the areas while preserving recreational opportunities.
  • Wilderness protection for 109,961 acres in the Nantahala-Pisgah National Forests.  Hunting, fishing, horseback riding, and hiking are among the many activities that would be welcomed in these areas. While the Forest Service can recommend wilderness, it would have to be approved by Congressional legislation and signed into law by the president.

Those who support the recommendations put forth in the MOU can help by providing public comments to the Forest Service that both endorses a plan that provides more public access and recreation, and protects more of our backcountry and wild places.

Comments can be submitted via email at NCPlanRevision@fs.fed.us or via mail at United States Forest Service Supervisor’s Office, 160 Zillicoa St, Suite A, Asheville, NC 28801.

For more information, contact:

Brent Martin, The Wilderness Society – Southern Appalachian Regional Director
(828) 587-9453 • brent_martin@tws.org

Josh Kelly, MountainTrue – Public Lands Field Biologist
828.258.8737 x 210 • josh@mountaintrue.org

Read Full Text of the MOU

Mayfield on the Challenge within Duke’s Revised Proposal

Mayfield on the Challenge within Duke’s Revised Modernization Plan

MountainTrue Co-director Julie Mayfield has a new guest column in this week’s issue of the MountainXpress where she discusses the challenge posed by Duke Energy’s revised Western Carolinas Modernization Project.

On November 4, Duke Energy, citing more than 9,000 public comments, revised their plans in the face of widespread community opposition. The power utility reduced the size of the natural gas power plant slated to replace the coal-fired plant at Lake Julian and scrapped plans for new transmission lines through Henderson and Polk counties and a new substation in Campobello, South Carolina.

But, as Julie points out in her column:

While the utility has reduced the overall size of the proposed natural gas plant, it has also issued a warning: Unless something changes in Western North Carolina, Duke will need to build an additional gas-fueled, 190-megawatt peaking unit to meet growing demand. This would commit us to an even greater reliance on climate-changing fossil fuels for the foreseeable future.

The region is growing, as are our energy needs. If we are going to move the region not just beyond coal but toward a fossil-fuel-free future, local residents and businesses, municipal and county governments and, indeed, Duke Energy must work together.

Read the full column at MountainXpress.

Swimguide – the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Swimguide – the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

For seven months, from April 1 to October 31, over 25 volunteers took more than 575 E. coli water samples to ensure the waterways of the French Broad River are safe for swimming. This data was collected from 22 sites throughout the watershed, from Rosman in Transylvania County to Hot Springs in Madison County.

Overall, the data shows the French Broad River is in good shape, with 86% of our sites testing safe for recreation use a majority of the time. However, there is still a lot of work to make sure all the sites meet the goals of the Clean Water Act to be fishable and swimmable.

We chose testing sites where we people frequently use the river for recreation purposes. While most of our testing sites are on the French Broad River itself, we also collected samples from tributaries, including the Mills and Swannanoa Rivers, and Cane, Hominy and Big Laurel Creeks. Our volunteers test their sites for E. coli once a week and publish the results on the swimguide.org website and the smartphone app. E. coli is a bacteria found in the waste (feces) of warm-blooded animals, including humans and cattle, and high levels of E. coli in our waters can be a risk to human health and the environment.

MountainTrue volunteers have been trained to sample, incubate and interpret their results using a standard set by the EPA. Waters with less than 235 colony forming units per 100 mL are safe for recreating, those above are not. Swim Guide uses a simple red-light, green-light system to depict whether a certain swimming hole or access point is safe for swimming or boating.  

Each sampling site is different and pollution problems vary throughout the watershed, but, fairly consistently across almost all sites, E. coli levels tend to spike in the river right after rain events. The reasons for this vary from site to site, but often include things like runoff from agriculture operations, sewer and septic overflows or leaks, and runoff from urban sources of bacteria, such as dog waste. However, there is another source that most people don’t consider and that is legacy bacteria that remains in the river sediments. This bacteria is stirred up by rain and contributes to the high levels in the river after rain events. If you don’t have the Swim Guide data handy, a general rule is that bacteria levels are low when the river is clear and spike when the river runs muddy.  

Despite the overall positive results, our data has shown there are still some problematic locations. Hominy Creek and Cane Creek are often much higher in E. coli than is recommended by the EPA. MountainTrue is using this data to target these streams for additional monitoring in order to track pollution sources.

Below is a quick breakdown of our testing season this year.

The Good

Top 5 Sites and percentage green

  1. Mills River – 100%
  2. Pisgah Forest Access – 96.3%
  3. Swannanoa River at Azalea Park – 92.59%
  4. Pearson Bridge – 89.29%
  5. Champion Park – 88.46%

Why are these sites good?

It is very hard to say with certainty why a specific site is rated high or low, but land use has a big impact on water quality. The land use that most of these sites have in common is a forested watershed. All these spots, with the exception of Pearson Bridge, are bordered by a good amount of forested land. Less development and less surrounding agriculture mean there are few sources for E. coli and a good stream buffer of trees to filter out any pollution that exists. Forests equal good land management and the Mills River site is a great example. It is completely surrounded by Pisgah National Forest and the data shows it is clean for 100% of our samples. Overall 13 of 15 sites on the main stem of the French Broad River are rated good over 70% of the time. Six of 15 sites on the French Broad River are rated good over 80% of the time. These sites include all four sites in Transylvania County as well at Pearson Bridge and Woodfin River Park. Over 50% of the land in Transylvania County is publicly owned and protected, which explain a lot the low levels of E. coli in our samples.

The Pearson Bridge site is not easy to explain as it sits in the middle of heavy land use, surrounded by the City of Asheville, but some of its success can be attributed to the millions of dollars the Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD) has put into improving their sewage collection over the years. A historically leaky system has been dramatically improved; this is one possible reason that this site in the middle of Asheville and along the very popular tube to the Bywater is so clean

The Bad

Worst 5 sites and percentage green

  1. Hominy Creek Greenway – 44%
  2. Hominy Creek at Buncombe County Sports Park – 44%
  3. Cane Creek  at Fletcher Park – 45%
  4. French Broad at Bent Creek River Park – 56%
  5. Big Laurel Creek – 68%

Why are these sites bad?

Again, it is hard to say exactly why  a site is bad, but land use is the likely culprit. Hominy Creek sits in a rapidly growing valley that drains Enka, Candler and West Asheville. The valley is a network of septics systems and sewers that vary widely in the quality. Aging sewers can leak, back up and overflow during heavy rains, or discharge high amounts of E. coli if the system doesn’t function correctly. Septic systems only work when they are correctly maintained. Because these systems are usually “out of sight and out of mind,” routine maintenance is neglected. Instances of straight piping along some waterways still exist. This was a much more common practice years ago, as it refers to piping your sewage or wastewater directly into a creek or stream. The Hominy Valley is also home to numerous agricultural operations that could be contributing to the stream impairment problem along the creek. We are monitoring the creek more closely to track down the sources of this pollution and improve the water quality of the creek.

Cane Creek is a similar mix of land. The headwaters of the creek flow through Fairview, then the creek snakes through a mix of rural residential and agricultural lands before flowing through Fletcher on its way to the French Broad River. MountainTrue has documented several agricultural operations that are impacting the creek and we are working to improve those. Big Laurel is a largely agricultural, but MountainTrue has not yet done enough additional monitoring to determine the extent agriculture impacts the stream. The Bent Creek site is a bit of mystery, but there are some limitations in the sampling that make it hard to fully quantify the results.

The timing of our testing greatly impacts the bacteria counts. Our samples are taken once a week. Therefore, they are just a snapshot in time. It is possible that sometimes a volunteer’s sampling just happens to fall right after a rain event for multiple weeks in a row. In a place like Western North Carolina, rain is a big factor in the results of our work.    

The Ugly

Highest E. Coli count – Hominy Creek Greenway 7500/100Ml. We don’t actually have a photo of this event, but the image at the top of this post is another ugly one from Hominy Creek Greenway coming in at over 1700.