The 2021 State of the River Reports are finally here! In this blog, we’ll discuss the cleanliness and water quality of the French Broad, Broad and Green, and Watauga River watersheds.
There are four sets of data that MountainTrue uses to formulate our water quality rankings for each stream, including:
- E. coli data taken by MountainTrue’s riverkeepers and water quality monitoring volunteers.
- Aquatic insect (a.k.a., benthic macroinvertebrate) data — part of the Stream Monitoring Information Exchange program (SMIE) — from the Environmental Quality Institute. Learn more about SMIE here.
- Chemical data — part of the Volunteer Water Information Network (VWIN) — from the Environmental Quality Institute.
- Chemical, aquatic insect, fish, and bacteria data from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ).
The data from testing sites in streams across each watershed are weighed, and each stream is given a letter grade. The grading scale is as follows:
A (90-100): These streams have excellent water quality, low pollution levels, and healthy aquatic insect and fish populations.
B (80-89): These streams have good water quality but some impacts from pollution or development. The aquatic life and fish populations are relatively healthy.
C (70-79): These streams have average water quality. There are some concerns about pollution inputs and development impacts. Generally, aquatic life and fish populations are healthy but could become negatively impacted
D (60-69): These streams have below-average water quality. Pollution is a concern, and aquatic life and fish populations are not as healthy as they should be.
F (<60): These streams have poor water quality. Pollution levels are often high, and aquatic life and fish populations are impacted.
When comparing this year’s report to 2018’s report, it’s important to note that the way we process our water samples for E.coli at MountainTrue has changed. Up until 2018, we used an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved method using Coliscan Easygel. The results from this method were sometimes subjective and thus could be less accurate. In 2019, we switched to another EPA-approved protocol, using the Idexx system. Those results are quicker, more objective, and more accurate. This 2021 report includes E.coli data from both analysis methods (2018 Swim Guide data using Coliscan Easygel and 2019-2021 Swim Guide data using the Idexx system).
Now, let’s review the findings from each of the three reports.