MountainStrong Hurricane Recovery Fund

In the wake of Hurricane Helene, MountainTrue is dedicated to addressing the urgent needs of our community.

 - 
Arabic
 - 
ar
Bengali
 - 
bn
German
 - 
de
English
 - 
en
French
 - 
fr
Hindi
 - 
hi
Indonesian
 - 
id
Portuguese
 - 
pt
Russian
 - 
ru
Spanish
 - 
es
Halfway Through Swim Guide Season 2022 – Watauga Riverkeeper

Halfway Through Swim Guide Season 2022 – Watauga Riverkeeper

Watauga Riverkeeper Report:

Swim Guide Season 2022

We’re officially halfway through this year’s Swim Guide season!

Scroll on and check out these handy graphics to learn more about our High Country E. coli facts and figures and find out which Watauga Riverkeeper sampling sites have the lowest and highest E. coli averages. We’ll continue to post our weekly results on the Swim Guide platform until September. 

Follow us on social media!

French Broad Paddle Trail & Recreation Manager Position

French Broad Paddle Trail & Recreation Manager
Asheville, NC
Apply Now

Position Description

This is a full-time paid position based in MountainTrue’s Central Region. This position is focused on stewarding and expanding the French Broad River State Paddle Trail and supporting MountainTrue’s outdoor recreation projects and programming in Western North Carolina. The paddle trail work will consume most of this person’s time for the first 18-24 months. The recreation portion of the position will grow over time as the paddle trail improvements are completed.

Responsibilities

 

French Broad Paddle Trail Administration

  • Coordinate with NC State Parks – State Trails program:
    • Great Trails State Coalition
    • 2023 Year of the Trail
    • Complete the Trails funding
    • Website information
  • Coordinate with nonprofit paddle trail partners as well as government and outfitter partners
  • Write and implement grants to support Paddle Trail projects and programming
  • Manage French Broad Paddle Trail website: www.frenchbroadpaddle.com:
    • Keep standing information and photos updated and informative.
    • Add timely and relevant information as applicable.
    • Receive and manage campsite bookings.
    • Create and manage event bookings as applicable.
    • Respond to questions from users and the public as they arise.
    • Manage map sales and other swag as applicable.

French Broad Paddle Trail Stewardship

  • Conduct routine stewardship of the six MountainTrue-managed Paddle Trail campsites:
    • Routine stewardship includes: mowing grass, brushing vegetation, shoveling fire pits, cleaning toilets, stocking supplies, repairing picnic tables, clearing steps/access, removing fallen trees, repairing and adding signage, picking up litter, etc.
  • Help maintain the shared pickup truck, trailer, boats, mowers, tools, supplies, equipment, etc.
  • Support partners in routine maintenance of other parts of the Paddle Trail:
    • Clearing debris jams/strainers.
    • Stewarding public access points and riverside parks.
    • Maintaining and contributing to public signage.
  • Manage French Broad Riverkeeper’s Guide Book:
    • Coordinate updates, printing, sales, advertisements, etc.
    • Incorporate State Trail language and information.
    • Consider creation of other mapping resources, such as additional print maps, applications, etc.

French Broad River Paddle Trail Expansion

  • Develop and implement an updated business and marketing/branding plan with Mountain BizWorks.
  • Upgrade Paddle Trail website for ease of use and maintenance. 
  • Plan and lead paddling events to inspire and educate users.
  • Add and update signage along Paddle Trail: mile-markers, bridges, river access sites, campsites, hazards.
  • Improve MountainTrue-managed campsites, including new access points, compost toilets, campsite expansion, etc
  • Stackhouse River Access: coordinate with private boaters, commercial outfitters, and land managers to expand, improve, and maintain private boater parking.
  • Hot Springs River Access: work with NOC and Madison County to secure long-term public access and improvements for users.
  • Woodfin Greenway & Blueway: support the project, including Woodfin Wave.
  • Strategic Master Plan for the French Broad River Blueway in Transylvania County: help implement the plan through technical support, project management, and fundraising.
  • Mud Creek: support efforts to steward stream corridor for trash and woody debris, and facilitate public access for paddlers, anglers, etc.
  • Lead and support events, sponsorships, media outreach, sharing Paddle Trail, information to other map/information sources, consider creation of swag, etc.

Regional Recreation Support

Add technical support and project management capacity to MountainTrue’s regional directors, healthy communities program, and partnering organizations for outdoor recreation endeavors.

  • Inventory, assess, prioritize, and provide technical support to projects focused on outdoor recreation amenities, including parks, trails, greenways, river access, other public lands, etc. 
  • Procure pertinent information and data for comment periods, presentations, and outreach relating to public land management, policy updates, protection designations, etc.
  • Support prioritization, planning, and technical operations relating to dam removal for recreational and ecological benefits.
  • Utilize GIS mapping and analysis to support the responsibilities listed above.
  • Equitably engage with marginalized communities to advance public access opportunities.

Qualifications

  • Demonstrated commitment to racial equity and inclusion 
  • Ability to organize and lead programs with partners, members, and the public
  • Good with tools and maintenance, including weed eater, riding mower, chainsaw, and power tools
  • Ability to work under all weather conditions
  • Self-reliant, good problem solver, results-oriented
  • Ability to make decisions in a changing environment and anticipate future needs
  • Energetic, flexible, collaborative, and proactive. Team player.

The following are preferred:

  • College or advanced degree in a field related to the environment or outdoor recreation
  • Experience with online communications tools
  • Mapping experience
  • Paddling and outdoor recreation experience

Compensation

 Mid-40s. Benefits package includes 20-25 vacation days per year, 12 holidays, sick leave, sabbatical after five years, health insurance, simple IRA with employer contribution of up to 3%.

How to Apply

Email cover letter, resume, and three references to French Broad Riverkeeper Hartwell Carson at hartwell@mountaintrue.orgThe subject line should read “French Broad Paddle Trail and Recreation Manager”.  The cover letter should include answers to the following questions in 600 words or less:

  1. Why are you interested in this position?
  2. Why do you think you would be good at it?

 

Application deadline: September 30, 2022

Taking Action on Timber Sales

Taking Action on Timber Sales

Taking Action on Timber Sales

From the very early days of its existence, a central focus of MountainTrue has been sustainable forest management on public lands, especially within Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests.

By Bob Gale, MountainTrue Ecologist and Public Lands Director

While much hard work was accomplished in getting the horrendous 1987 Forest Plan substantially amended in 1994, this did not alleviate all concerns over the U.S. Forest Service’s (USFS) management activities. Concerns repeatedly arose when timber sales were planned by various Ranger Districts within the two national forests. A few of these have been notable, and MountainTrue members and staff were often successful in getting the most controversial parts of these projects removed. The following are some examples:

Roaring Hole

The Roaring Hole Timber Sale was significant in that it was the first time USFS meaningfully responded to a Western North Carolina Alliance (WNCA) appeal of a timber project. WNCA volunteer and retired Silviculturist, Walton Smith (see Cut The Clearcutting), wanted to appeal the sale after an earlier appeal of the similar Little Laurel timber project had been denied. Smith wanted to strengthen this appeal by documenting on-the-ground information in the Roaring Hole project to show USFS the errors he saw in their project management. After consulting with Smith, WNCA Director Mary Kelly and her husband, Rob (who was an experienced professional forester), decided to hike into the timber sale stands to conduct the survey. In Mary’s words:

“We met Clarence Hall, a bear hunter from the Greens Creek Community of Jackson County who was concerned about the sale, at the beginning of a long, gated USFS road on an extremely frozen, shiny winter day — I about froze my ass off! We needed Clarence to guide us to the timber stands and also help us identify those tricky winter trees, since Rob and I were greenhorns in the WNC mountains. But before we could start our survey, Clarence informed us that we first had to rescue a couple of his neighbor’s lost bear dogs — one of which had been dragging a chain and was found stuck on a stump! With that unexpected task completed, Rob took forester’s prism plots to document stand characteristics for Walton’s premise that USFS was doing ‘cookie cutter’ clearcuts on very diverse kinds of stands and never considering alternative methods despite huge public concern. The information we gathered resulted in the first-ever remand of a USFS individual timber sale… it turned out NC National Forest Supervisor Bjorn Dahl, who was a silviculturist, agreed with Rob and Walton’s plot data showing stand diversity and the ‘cookie cutter’ problem.  It was a momentous victory!”

Their success went beyond this timber sale. Supervisor Dahl had ordered a resurvey of the stands during the growing season (when plant diversity is most evident) and wanted research on alternate, non-clearcutting logging methods. Mary jumped at the chance to accompany the eminent USFS Southern Research Station scientist, David Loftis, on another visit to Roaring Hole. Loftis had been focusing on oak silviculture study because clearcuts were not resulting in the desired oak tree regeneration following such logging. He was also advising a Ph.D. candidate, Don McLeod — a Professor of Botany at Mars Hill College who, late in life was pursuing another degree, “Plant Communities of the Black Mountains” — documenting cove forest plant diversity. Their survey turned up an important plant ecosystem. 

Dave Loftis and I started wading through classic and significant cove vegetation up to our butts. We looked at each other and realized it simultaneously,” Mary remembers. “I called Dan Pittillo (Western Carolina University’s well-known Professor of Botany) and he informed me the proposed clearcut units were right on top of some sites he had forwarded to NC Natural Heritage Program as rare plant sites!”

By educating USFS about the diversity Mary and others had found at Roaring Fork and pushing for better project analysis, WNCA was successful in moving the agency toward change. Mary and WNCA’s legal advisor, Ron Wilson (who had also authored WNCA’s successful Appeal of the 1987 Forest Plan), used the field data in their next appeal — the Bee Tree Timber Sale in Transylvania County. USFS responded positively by improving its environmental impact assessments of proposed projects from what had been typically four-paged “no info-no problem” documents to those which included botanical surveys for the first time. The agency also hired its first staff botanist. These changes activated a new agency focus on the importance of rare plant species within WNC’s forest ecosystems — rare plants were previously largely ignored by USFS, and Mary recalls how one silviculturist referred to them as step-overs.

Bluff Mountain 

On the heels of the 1994 Nantahala-Pisgah Forest Management Plan Amendment victory (see Cut The Clearcutting), a backlash of dissatisfaction from some in the timber industry put pressure on USFS. Said pressure was the likely catalyst of the momentum behind the Bluff Mountain Timber Sale proposal. 

The project called for 200 acres of logging and six miles of new roads carved over the biologically significant forests of Bluff Mountain and over the border into Tennessee’s Cherokee National Forest. Incredibly, it would also cross through the 400+ acre Fowler Tract, recently acquired by USFS for the specific purpose of protecting the Appalachian Trail. This was the biggest timber sale that USFS had ever proposed and the road mileage outraged the local Bluff community, including Hot Springs residents, bear hunters, tourism businesses, and raft companies. Many of these folks were also WNCA members.

 WNCA didn’t initiate the Bluff Mountain campaign – it had recently lost some key forest staff and was also consumed with the highly controversial issue of extending I-26 through Madison County into Tennessee. However, many of its experienced members joined with others to fight the project using tactics they learned working within the Alliance. Elmer Hall, owner of the historic Sunnybank Inn and a Hot Springs WNCA member, notes that WNCA’s Director, Ron Lambe, “gave us all kinds of support, including widespread publicity about the negative aspects of the project through his close contacts in the news media.” 

Ultimately, the campaign succeeded — the roads were not built and only about 20 acres of logging occurred. In addition, the coalition was able to get USFS to establish the Betty Place Trail in the former homestead site of that departed and much admired local resident.

Big Choga  

In 1997, the Wayah Ranger District proposed a timber sale in the Valley River Mountains not far from Hayesville, which included the Big Choga Creek drainage. The sale attracted the attention of WNCA staff, its local members, and bear hunters for a singular reason. Big Choga was home to intact and documented old-growth forest communities (see Seeking Older Forests: WNCA’s Search For Treasure Trees), and WNCA was adamant about protecting WNC’s national forests. The bear hunting community was equally upset because old-growth trees — which are often hollow but nevertheless live on for many decades — were an important winter habitat for hibernating black bears. 

WNCA’s Old-Growth Committee member and researcher, Rob Messick, had already made site visits to Big Choga and was in the later stages of data collection for the upcoming old-growth report. Messick continued to make site visits throughout the sale process. Because he and his assistants had identified numerous old-growth trees and mostly undisturbed habitat, WNCA determinedly appealed the project’s Final Decision, which called for logging in these communities. 

While this was going on, an amazing story had been unfolding that grabbed national attention. During the Atlanta 1996 summer Olympics, a backpack bomb had been found in Centennial Olympic Park by a police officer. He managed to evacuate much of the crowd before the bomb exploded, but two people ultimately died and 111 were injured. The bomb was traced to one Eric Rudolph, who had been active in the pro-life movement and who happened to have grown up in the WNC mountains. After the Atlanta attack, Rudolph went on the run and was a most-wanted fugitive. 

It was highly publicized that Rudolf had excellent wilderness survival skills. Media reports claimed he could live off the land indefinitely, intimately knew the WNC mountain topography, and had many hiding spots there. Rudolf’s truck was found abandoned at a campground very near the Big Choga area. Local police and the FBI began a manhunt, searching the area’s forests and coincidentally encountering Messick’s old-growth researchers during their site visits. They were allowed to continue collecting old-growth data, but the encounters and news stories added a surreal experience to their research. The myth of Rudolph’s wilderness survival capabilities was eventually dispelled when the fugitive was found raiding a dumpster in Murphy, NC.

WNCA Executive Coordinator Brownie Newman requested a Big Choga timber sale site visit with the Wayah District, which was granted, and then worked with WNCA’s local Tusquittee Chapter Chair, Aurelia Stone, to turn out members for the visit. A long line of cars was given access through the gated road to the Big Choga sale and throughout the day, these volunteers and staff made their case to the District Ranger and his resource staff. During a break within a contested timber stand, a major discussion ensued and at one notable point, the Ranger asked his Botanist, “Do you think this is an old-growth forest?” His Botanist replied, “Well — Yes, I do.” After the visit, Newman gathered with the WNCA group and they collectively agreed to a bottom line of which points could be retained and dropped in order to settle the Appeal. It was unanimous that the old-growth stands must be dropped.

In the subsequent Informal Disposition meeting in Franklin, NC, Brownie could not convince the District Ranger to leave out the old-growth, so he stated that WNCA would not drop its Appeal. As he turned to walk out, the Ranger suddenly called him back. He started adjusting lines on the sale proposal map with his pen, removing nearly all of the old-growth areas. In the end, a consensus was reached and the Appeal was dropped. It was the first time this Ranger had ever agreed to WNCA terms on a project.

Big Choga had a lasting impact in establishing a precedent. Citing this milestone agreement in his written comments and negotiations with other ranger districts, WNCA Ecologist Bob Gale and members of the WNCA Forest Task Force were able to convince USFS to avoid old-growth in later timber projects. Soon after Big Choga, Rob Messick’s landmark report, Old Growth Communities in the Nantahala-Pisgah National Forest (Messick, May 2000), was published by WNCA, giving the organization even more leverage in championing old-growth protection in Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests.

Marley Kelly Wins Top 2022 Carson Conservation Scholarship Award

Marley Kelly Wins Top 2022 Carson Conservation Scholarship Award

Marley Kelly Wins Top 2022 Carson Conservation Scholarship Award

Marley Kelly, the recipient of this year’s top Carson Conservation Scholarship award.

This year’s top Glenn F. Carson, II Memorial Conservation Scholarship award winner is Clay County resident and 2022 Tri-County Early College graduate, Marlena (Marley) Kelly. Marley is interested in a career in ecology and has been getting a jump start by volunteering with MountainTrue this past winter and spring to remove nonnative invasive plants on the Murphy River Walk & Canoe Trail. Marley is heading to NC State University this fall, where she plans to pursue a Biological Sciences degree with Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Intent. Her scholarship is $2,000 and is renewable at $1,000 per year for up to three additional years, based on continued eligibility.

In her scholarship application, Marley wrote, “I hope to build sustainable relationships between people and nature so that we can learn to live together and thrive from the benefits of working with the earth. I am not sure yet what my specific career path will look like but I am very passionate about helping the environment and protecting the earth’s fascinating animals.”

Additional $500 scholarships were awarded to Baylee Parham from Robbinsville High School in Graham County and Lauren Cheeks from Hayesville High School in Clay County. Baylee is planning to attend the University of North Carolina at Charlotte where she will major in Science Education. Lauren will major in Environmental Science at Young Harris College in Young Harris, Georgia.

Originally established in 2014 by the Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition (now MountainTrue’s Western Regional Office), the Carson Conservation Scholarship is a memorial to the late Glenn F. Carson, II. At the time of his death, Glenn was the District Conservationist for Cherokee, Clay and Graham counties with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and was an important leader in the WNC conservation community. He was a graduate of Western Carolina University. 

The Carson Conservation Scholarship assists young people from Cherokee, Clay, and Graham counties who want to pursue higher education in natural resource conservation fields such as agriculture, forestry, environmental science, health or engineering, and wildlife management. To date, $20,500 in scholarship funds have been awarded to 14 students.

Baylee Parham

Baylee Parham

Lauren Cheeks

Lauren Cheeks

To support more students through the Carson Conservation Scholarship fund, make a donation at mountaintrue.org/join and mark your donation as “In Memory of Glenn F. Carson, II.”

Signing Up for the Hike-a-Thon: A Step by Step Guide

Signing Up for the Hike-a-Thon: A Step by Step Guide

Does MountainTrue care about trees? You bet your Ash we do!

Does MountainTrue care about trees? You bet your Ash we do!

Does MountainTrue care about trees? You bet your Ash we do!

Pictured above: MountainTrue’s AmeriCorps Forest Keeper, Ellianna McLaughlin, stands at the base of a large ash tree in Pisgah National Forest.

 

From April to June 2022, MountainTrue’s Public Lands team re-treated hundreds of ash trees in Pisgah and Nantahala National Forests to continue protecting them against the emerald ash borer. We’ve treated approximately 1,200 ash trees since 2017 with help from our trusted partners at the Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC). Many thanks to our stellar MountainTrue volunteers and interns, the wonderful folks at Appalachian Arborists, and our ATC partners for making 2022’s successful treatment season a true “teamwork makes the dream work” scenario. 

Click here to read more about this year’s treatment season and our partnership with ATC in more detail. 

Quick facts:

What is the emerald ash borer?

The emerald ash borer is a nonnative invasive insect that was first identified in Michigan in 2002. This invasive beetle has spread to 35 states since then, including North Carolina. 

What does the emerald ash borer do?

Emerald ash borer larvae bore into the bark of ash trees to feed on the cambium — a cell layer that transports nutrients throughout the tree. The beetles girdle the trees as they feed on the cambium, causing them to die. The devastating effects of the emerald ash borer were seen throughout our treatment areas as the giant ash trees we left untreated began to fall. However, with a highly effective treatment method, MountainTrue has been able to save thousands of ash trees over the last several years. 

Where can I see treated ash trees? 

Hike along the Moffett Laurel section of the Appalachian Trail or make a pit stop off the Blue Ridge Parkway and hike the section between the Mills River Valley Overlook and Stony Bald View to see the thriving, treated ash trees! Pro tip: you can also use this as an opportunity to support MountainTrue by taking part in the 40th-anniversary Hike-a-Thon

 

Removing the Ward’s Mill Dam and Reconnecting Aquatic Habitats

Removing the Ward’s Mill Dam and Reconnecting Aquatic Habitats

Removing the Ward’s Mill Dam and Reconnecting Aquatic Habitats

Pictured above: Deconstruction of the Ward’s Mill Dam near Boone, North Carolina. See more photos in the blog gallery below. 

By Andy Hill, Watauga Riverkeeper and MountainTrue High Country Regional Director

In a huge win for local aquatic wildlife, the Ward’s Mill Dam has finally been removed! The dam removal process was a three-year effort that was well worth the wait. Working in partnership with American Rivers, Blue Ridge Resource Conservation and Development, Watauga County Soil and Water Conservation District, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service, this $1.2 million project reconnected 35 miles of aquatic habitat in the main stem of the Watauga River and 140 miles of streams across the watershed. Now, populations of native fish species — like the tangerine darter — and threatened salamanders — like the hellbender — are reunited and will benefit from an improved cold-water habitat.

Located just a few miles from Boone, North Carolina, the dam was originally constructed in 1890 and underwent some structural improvements over the years. The mill complex served the surrounding community for generations by providing electricity, jobs, firewood, and building materials. However, the dam had been an obstacle for local aquatic wildlife for the past 130 years. The dam removal was a high priority for experts and biologists and was considered to be a top priority project by both the Southeast Aquatic Resource Partnership and the North Carolina Aquatic Barrier Assessment Tool.

Dam deconstruction began in May 2021 and was performed by Wildlands Engineering and the Aquatic Restoration team from the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Fish Passage Program. Project funding was generously provided by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources, Patagonia, the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, Beech Mountain Resort, Hunter Banks of Asheville, and Boone’s Fly Shop.

MountainTrue’s Watauga Riverkeeper, Andy Hill, is excited about the environmental benefits of the dam removal and the opportunity to create more recreational opportunities by connecting the Watauga River Paddle Trail to the section of the Watauga once occupied by the Ward’s Mill Dam. “We’ve greatly improved aquatic habitat and river health,” says Hill, “and we’ll continue to promote safe river recreation while honoring the historical and community cultural value of the Ward Mill.”

The Ward family continues their generations-long environmental stewardship by removing this aquatic barrier and graciously surrendering their hydropower license with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. While the instream dam structure has been completely removed down to bedrock to reconnect the watershed and allow for sediment transport downstream, the iconic sawmill, historic buildings, and complex have been preserved in partnership with the State Historic Preservation Office. Please respect the decision and the privacy of the Ward family at this time.

“We are excited to see the long-term environmental benefits associated with removing the dam, but are also excited about preserving the rich history of the dam complex by documenting and saving the nearby historic buildings,” explains Jonathan Hartsell of Blue Ridge Resource Conservation and Development. “This complex project has been successful from start to finish due to a well thought out gameplan from the project management team, agency partners, and most importantly, the landowners.”

The complex project required careful execution to maintain the delicate biodiversity of the Watauga River and its streams. Dr. Mike Gangloff and Dr. Derek Martin of Appalachian State University led a team of researchers to collect valuable aquatic habitat data before and after the dam removal. The research team conducted sediment flow research, aquatic habitat surveys, and numerous nocturnal scuba dives to search for the elusive nocturnal hellbender salamander. The team’s sediment flow research and aquatic habitat surveys will better inform future dam removal projects and contribute to the field of knowledge for river restoration.

While they offer benefits in certain circumstances, dams can also significantly damage rivers. Dams increase water temperature, reduce river flows, lessen the amount of dissolved oxygen required by fish, amphibians, and other aquatic species, and block the natural flow of sediment and debris. Dams also serve as physical barriers for river recreationalists such as paddlers and anglers, as well as aquatic wildlife. Additionally, most dams require frequent maintenance, and many require removal or rebuilding after 50 years.

“Rivers are like a circulatory system, and thanks to this dam removal, American Rivers and our partners celebrate a free-flowing Watauga River, which is the lifeblood of a thriving community, healthy ecosystems, and clean water for people and nature,” says Erin McCombs, American Rivers Science Program Director and Southeast Conservation Director.

Just over one-year post-removal, life has returned to this section of the Watauga River in a major way. Over 5,000 live stakes and 600 pounds of wildflower seed have been planted in the riparian zone along the river banks. These plantings will help shade the stream, prevent erosion, filter stormwater runoff, and create new aquatic habitats. Life has also returned under the river’s surface, with post-removal surveys showing a rise in both numbers and diversity of macroinvertebrates and fish species such as tangerine darters and war paint shiners. Juvenile hellbenders and hellbender eggs have also been discovered well upstream of the removal site for the first time in many years! 

“We’re encouraged by this progress and the increased biodiversity that is returning to this stretch of the Watauga River,” says Watauga Riverkeeper Andy Hill. “We’re forever grateful MountainTrue members because their support enables us to accomplish transformational watershed projects such as this.” 

Gallery photos: Nighttime deconstruction of the Ward’s Mill Dam; Watauga Riverkeeper Andy Hill and colleague stand in front of the mill; Andy Hill searches for hellbenders below the dam site; an excavator clears debris from the Watauga River.  

Take Action to Support a Strong Decarbonization Plan

Take Action to Support a Strong Decarbonization Plan

Take Action to Support a Strong Decarbonization Plan

MountainTrue, the Creation Care Alliance of WNC (CCA), and other local renewable energy advocates are pushing for a stronger decarbonization plan to help North Carolina meet the renewable energy goals laid out in HB 951, the “Energy Solutions for North Carolina” bill passed by the NC General Assembly in October 2021.

The North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) is hosting a series of hearings in the coming months to receive public feedback on Duke Energy’s draft Carbon Plan. MountainTrue, CCA, NC Interfaith Power and Light (NCIPL), the Sierra Club and other local groups are encouraging the public to show their support for a stronger decarbonization plan at NCUC’s hearing in Asheville on July 27.

MountainTrue, CCA, and NCIPL hosted a free webinar about Duke Energy’s draft Carbon Plan on Wednesday, July 13. The webinar featured MountainTrue Central Regional Director Gray Jernigan and NCIPL Director Susannah Tuttle, M.Div, as guest speakers. Webinar attendees learned about the implications and shortcomings of Duke Energy’s Carbon Plan and left with the information needed to take action in support of our state’s clean energy future at the upcoming NCUC hearing on July 27. Click here to watch the webinar recording on the MountainTrue YouTube channel.

During the public hearings, NCUC asks that only one representative from a given organization speak. In addition to organizational representatives, independent individuals may offer testimony and those that do not wish to testify may observe the proceedings and/or gather and demonstrate outside of the hearing venue. Demonstrations are not allowed in the hearing room. A virtual statewide hearing is scheduled for August 23, 2022. Click here for more information on the process, schedule, and opportunities for public input.

Advocating for a just, equitable, and science-based carbon plan is central to MountainTrue and CCA’s green energy and climate change-focused work. Everyone has the right to clean and affordable energy with the assurance of equitable energy production, transmission, distribution, and consumption that won’t harm our health, the health of non-human creatures, or the climate,” says CCA Director Sarah Ogletree, “we invite all who are interested to attend this webinar and we look forward to working together to shape North Carolina’s clean energy future.” 

Take Action!

Watch a webinar recording:

Our July 13 webinar covered the Carbon Plan’s most important takeaways and discussed the importance of a strong decarbonization plan in the face of climate change. 

Attend an upcoming NCUC hearing:

The hearing will take place at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 27 at the Buncombe County Courthouse (Courtroom 1-A at 60 Court Plaza, Asheville, NC 28801). 

Learn more about HB 951

The details of Duke’s draft Carbon Plan:

HB 951 charges NCUC with developing a Carbon Plan that takes reasonable steps toward achieving our state’s clean energy future and addresses the threats posed by climate change. The bill directs state regulators to cut carbon emissions from energy plants owned and/or operated by Duke Energy by 70% from 2005 levels by 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2050. Last November, NCUC ordered Duke Energy to file a draft Carbon Plan by May 16, 2022. 

Duke Energy is proposing four different portfolios to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, and they are requesting that NCUC approve all four options, essentially asking for blanket approval for whatever strategies and infrastructure the company wants to employ. Only one of the portfolios achieves HB 951’s interim goal of 70% carbon reduction by 2030, and that portfolio is the most costly of the four according to Duke’s analysis. All four portfolios achieve the 2050 carbon neutrality goal, though the means used to achieve said goal are starkly different from one another.

Each portfolio also includes 2400 megawatts (MW) of new natural gas and around 1000 MW of gas-fired peaking capacity.  And each one includes between 4900 and 6200 MW of coal plant retirements and efforts to reduce energy use through energy efficiency and demand side management programs. Here are the highlights:

Portfolio 1: Achieves the 70% carbon emissions reductions by 2030 with 800 MW (one 800 MW block) of offshore wind, 5400 MW of new solar, and the addition of nearly 1,800 MW of new battery energy storage capacity. The average annual bill impact estimated by Duke’s analysis is a 2.5% increase.

Portfolio 2: Achieves the 70% carbon emissions reductions by 2032 with two 800 MW blocks of offshore wind — the first in 2029 and the second in 2031 — and 5800 MW of solar and less battery storage. The average annual bill impact estimated by Duke’s analysis is a 2.4% increase.

Portfolio 3: Achieves the 70% carbon emissions reductions by 2034 with new nuclear, 7700 MW of solar, 2200 MW of battery storage, and no offshore wind. The average annual bill impact estimated by Duke’s analysis is a 1.9% increase.

Portfolio 4: Achieves the 70% carbon emissions reductions by 2034 with both offshore wind and new nuclear, 6800 MW of solar, and 1800 MW of storage. The average annual bill impact estimated by Duke’s analysis is a 2.0% increase.

“Duke Energy’s draft Carbon Plan makes significant advances in the development of solar and wind energy resources and battery storage. However,” explains MountainTrue’s Gray Jernigan, “Duke’s draft plan falls short because it relies too heavily on unproven technologies like small modular nuclear reactors. Additionally, it proposes new natural gas plants and fails to use cost assumptions that reflect market realities of the affordability of renewable energy generation compared to gas.” Click here to review Duke Energy’s entire draft Carbon Plan and its summaries.

HB 951 places the responsibility of developing our state’s final Carbon Plan on NCUC rather than Duke Energy, requiring NCUC to incorporate public input into the planning process. NCUC should carry out its public input process in a way that meaningfully involves and seeks input from historically marginalized communities, including communities of color.

NCUC has the ultimate authority to adopt the best Carbon Plan for the state — not necessarily one of the portfolios proposed by Duke Energy. We believe that NCUC should develop a carbon plan that centers the well-being of NC communities, prioritizes a climate justice-based legislative approach, and reduces our state’s dependency on fossil fuels to mitigate the effects of climate change. Therefore, MountainTrue is encouraging NCUC to exercise its authority to the fullest extent to achieve the goals of HB 951 and protect the people and environment of North Carolina.

We at MountainTrue urge NCUC to consider the following points to improve the Carbon Plan:

1) No New Gas. All four of Duke’s draft Carbon Plan scenarios rely on large quantities of new gas-fired generation. The Carbon Plan should avoid committing to new natural gas facility construction.

2) If Duke is going to miss the 2030 goal, miss it because of wind investments and not nuclear. Only Portfolio 1 meets the 70% reduction by 2030 goal, while the other three portfolios miss the  2030 target date. If that deadline is going to be missed, Portfolio 2 is the only other acceptable starting point with its expanded investments in offshore wind, although it will not meet the interim goal until 2032. Portfolios 3 and 4, which include new nuclear generation and miss the 2030 deadline, should be scrapped. 

“While we understand these are the costliest options to meet decarbonization goals, the additional investment in green renewable energy sources rather than unproven small nuclear energy sources and the faster timeline justify the increased cost when we are racing against the clock to mitigate the impacts of global climate change,” says Gray Jernigan. “Additionally, we will be joining others in advocating for rate structures that protect the most vulnerable populations and low to moderate income households who bear disproportionate impacts from environmental and financial standpoints.”

3) No Reliance on Commercially Unproven Technology. NCUC’s Carbon Plan must not rely on commercially unproven technologies like nuclear small modular reactors or gas plants that could theoretically be converted to hydrogen.

4) Use Energy Efficiency and Demand Side Management Before Building New Fossil Generation.* Energy Efficiency and Demand Response proposals are consistent across scenarios, at levels that were rejected by stakeholders in the Energy Efficiency and Demand Side Management Programs (EE/DSM) collaborative as insufficient. Essentially, NCUC should focus on maximizing energy efficiency and reducing demand instead of generating more power. EE/DSM Programs can be used to reduce the need for new generation, and NCUC should follow the example of utilities in other states in dramatically expanding these programs rather than proposing goals that fall below energy efficiency gains achieved by the utility in recent years.

*New generation: refers to Duke Energy-owned versus third-party-owned energy generation such as wind, solar, etc. 

5) Don’t Rely on the Utility’s Inflated Cost Assumptions. Utility ownership of generation increases the cost of new generation. NCUC must ensure that the Carbon Plan mandates the least cost, proven clean technology and does not rely on inflated utility cost assumptions for new generation and transmission.

6) Protect Historically Marginalized Communities. Prioritize the retirement of fossil fuel plants near communities that have been disproportionately burdened by the negative impacts of fossil fuels. Don’t let the utility site a new fossil fuel plant or pipelines in already burdened NC coal plant communities.  

7) Transmission. Transmission is the bottleneck limiting NC’s access to renewables. The Carbon Plan must order Duke to build sufficient transmission capacity to access the full potential of offshore wind, onshore wind, and solar power in a timely manner. 

8) Securitization. The Carbon Plan must clarify that Duke Energy will use securitization in a timely fashion to retire coal facilities and to lower costs for customers. The sooner coal plants are retired the more customers will benefit from savings from securitization.

9) The Carbon Plan should increase the resiliency of the state’s energy system. Energy systems are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and resource availability, and the Carbon Plan that is ultimately approved should increase the system’s resilience in the face of these threats. 

10) Alternative Plans Achieve the Carbon Plan Goals Without Reliance on New Gas and Should be Accorded Equal Weight with Duke Energy’s Draft Plan. Through the process, alternative plans may be submitted, and those should be given equal consideration by the NCUC. 

When Communities Come Together, We Can Move a Highway

When Communities Come Together, We Can Move a Highway

When Communities Come Together, We Can Move a Highway

After over 30 years of wrangling, the I-26 Connector project is finally slated to begin construction in 2023.

By Chris Joyell, MountainTrue Healthy Communities Director

The current I-26 design will look much different than what was originally proposed, thanks to the work of the MountainTrue and the Asheville Design Center. When the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) first proposed the Connector Project in 1989, it sparked widespread concern among Asheville residents living within its path. Typical of NCDOT projects at the time, the project catered to thru-traffic drivers and not to the needs of the people and neighborhoods of Asheville itself. If left unchallenged, it would have been overbuilt and threatened communities already harmed by previous highway projects.

In 2000, the community started organizing in earnest to oppose the plan. MountainTrue (then the Western North Carolina Alliance) co-chaired the Community Coordinating Committee (CCC), which issued a report recommending nine key design goals that the final project should achieve. These included separation of local and interstate traffic, matching the scale of the project to the character of community, reunification and connectivity of community, and minimization of neighborhood and local business impacts. These goals have continued to be the foundation for advocacy by residents and the City of Asheville ever since.

Pictured above: An Asheville Design Center-led I-26 design charette held in the MountainTrue office in 2006. 

Then in 2006, the Asheville section of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) secured grant funding to form the Asheville Design Center. This allowed the Center to begin holding community meetings, workshops, and design charrettes to create a community-authored design for I-26 that met the CCC’s goals. Eventually called Alternative 4B, this design was finished in 2007 and received broad community support, including funding from the City of Asheville and Buncombe County for an engineering study to prove that it was feasible.

In 2009, NCDOT committed to including a revised version of the community-designed Alternative 4B in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) – the first time anywhere in the country that a community-developed design became a viable alternative for a major highway project. Also in 2009, a coalition of representatives from the Asheville neighborhoods that stood to be most impacted by the new highway – including West Asheville, Burton Street, WECAN, Emma, and Montford – formed the I-26 ConnectUs Project. MountainTrue served as the convener and coordinator, using its expertise to amplify neighborhood concerns with NCDOT. The ConnectUs Project also adopted the CCC report’s goals as the basis for its advocacy.

In 2013, the I-26 Working Group came together and was made up of elected City and County officials, a representative of the business community, and MountainTrue as a representative of the ConnectUs Project. The Working Group secured consensus on several important issues, including that NCDOT should analyze the possibility of having fewer lanes through West Asheville and honor the City’s vision for the Jeff Bowen Bridge to become an urban boulevard. This effort also resulted in NCDOT committing to build a multi-use path from Haywood Road in West Asheville to and across the Bowen Bridge – a significant victory for community connectivity.

When NCDOT issued a revised Draft EIS in 2015, Asheville City Council passed a resolution in support of the community’s vision and formed a working group with NCDOT to hammer out the remaining issues. In 2016, NCDOT selected Alt. 4B as the preferred alternative for the project and, in 2017, NCDOT agreed that the highway in West Asheville would be six rather than eight lanes. That same year, the Asheville Design Center merged with MountainTrue, sharpening the organization’s focus on the built environment.

More recently, MountainTrue has worked to ensure that the land between Clingman Avenue and the Bowen Bridge — currently owned by NCDOT — gets returned to the city for redevelopment. Our aim is to extend Patton Avenue all the way to the Bowen Bridge, providing infill opportunities that can address our housing shortage, while also connecting downtown to the French Broad River and the Wilma Dykeman Riverway. In addition, we can realize new north-south connections between the Montford and WECAN neighborhoods, and provide the Hillcrest Apartments with a direct connection to Patton Avenue transit options.

Good transportation planning considers a community’s unique context and engages residents from the beginning. It should protect our most vulnerable neighborhoods, ecologically sensitive areas, and mountain views while minimizing the impacts on homes, businesses, and special community assets. Good transportation planning can improve quality of life, increase transportation options, make our communities healthier, and reduce pollution.  

In the coming years, we will see how these principles play out on the ground, and we will continue to advocate for an I-26 Connector that serves the people who live in, work in, and visit our city.

Cut the Clearcutting

Cut the Clearcutting

Cut the Clearcutting

Pictured above: WNCA members collected more than 15,000 petition signatures to stop the practice of clearcutting in Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. When all the petition pages were taped together, they were the length of three football fields.

By Bob Gale, MountainTrue Ecologist and Public Lands Director

In 1976, Congress passed the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) requiring the U.S. Forest Service to produce management plans for all national forests. The combined force of the NFMA and the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960 required the agency to adopt a multi-focus management approach that equally prioritized timber production, water, wildlife, and recreation in our national forests. 

Issued in 1987, the first Nantahala-Pisgah Management Plan was considered by many to simply be a 50-year blueprint for logging. Prior to the oil and gas drilling threat, the Forest Service had been ramping up timber sales in national forests around the U.S. The logging was occurring at an unstainable rate and it was employing the most damaging method of logging — clearcutting. This clearcutting was causing extensive damage to Western North Carolina’s (WNC) forest ecosystems. From erosion on mountain slopes to the severe sedimentation of streams and rivers, as well as the negative impacts on native plant and wildlife communities, this clearcutting harmfully manipulated and altered thriving forest stands throughout Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. Clearcutting also allowed for the Forest Service’s repeated entry into the stands to thin the resulting overcrowded and unhealthy trees with more cutting and/or herbicides.

The rampant and highly visible clearcutting that was taking place all over the WNC mountains angered the public. The passion and organizing capacity of WNC Alliance (WNCA) members channeled the wider public’s outcry into an effective, people-powered grassroots campaign, which gained the Forest Service’s attention and ultimately brought an end to clearcutting.

WNCA founders Esther Cunningham and David Liden enlisted the help of the organization’s Forest Management Task Force (FMTF) to address the clearcutting issue. The FMTF was comprised of an elite group of forest-savvy members from all over WNC and it received major credibility and inspiration from Walton Smith, a retired and well-respected Forest Service silviculturist. Smith and another retired forester and FMTF member, Bob Padgett, strongly believed that clearcutting — or even-aged management, as it was euphemistically known in the profession — was damaging mountain forest ecosystems. They also believed that more sustainable timber harvesting methods existed. Smith, Padgett, and another clearcutting critic and WNCA supporter, Clemson Emeritus Forestry Professor Bob Zahner, gave WNCA tremendous credibility on this issue. The FMTF cleverly attached the title, Cut The Clearcutting, to their crusade. FMTF members provided energy for the region-wide effort, which included local appeals, protests, letter-writing campaigns, and other activities.

Smith led WNCA members through timber sale stands to demonstrate how clearcutting was causing harm and explain how sustainable forestry should be accomplished. He re-designed the famous Biltmore Stick used to measure the potential value of a timber stand by adding other important measurements and renaming it the WalDee Stick — a combination of his own name and that of his wife, Dee. Smith taught WNCA members how to gather on-the-ground data by using the WalDee Stick, which the organization then used to document errors in Forest Service’s timber sale proposals. He also demonstrated how the agency’s removal of the diverse hardwood species in rich coves left them vulnerable to a tulip tree monoculture that suppressed oaks and other native species. 

Pictured above: MountainTrue’s Public Lands Field Biologist, Josh Kelly, counts the rings on a tree in Nantahala National Forest.

As Esther, David, and early WNCA members were wrestling with this problem, a young activist named Monroe Gilmour was fighting to protect an ill-thought-out proposal to begin logging in the Asheville Watershed — the source of the pristine drinking water supply for the city and its surrounding communities. Gilmour knew the water supply would be severely impacted if the forest canopy protecting the drainage system’s soils and headwaters were cleared. 

Gilmour rallied local concerned citizens and founded a group named Citizens Against Clearcutting the Asheville Watershed, with its jeering acronym “CACAW.” His campaign was successful in raising public concern and opposition to the proposal. Gilmour’s efforts ultimately led to the prohibition of logging in the watershed’s higher elevations through the creation of a conservation easement held by the city and the Conservation Trust of North Carolina.

Impressed with this success, WNCA hired Gilmour to help run its new Cut The Clearcutting campaign. He coordinated the diverse parts, including developing a schedule of events, getting the campaign covered in the media, printing petitions, and collecting signatures throughout WNC counties. A peak of the campaign occurred with a well-organized demonstration in Asheville involving a variety of knowledgeable speakers. The petitions were securely taped together by members of the Unity of the Blue Ridge Church in Henderson County and combined onto a giant roll. Another roll of petitions was compiled from businesses across the mountain counties. 

 

The demonstration began with a downtown march consisting of hundreds of participants led by a huge “Cut The Clearcutting!” banner and ended with volunteers unrolling of the long chain of petitions in front of the Forest Service Headquarters.

Appalachian mountain music played on guitar, fiddle, and banjo by Rob and Mary Kelly and Bill West of Madison County underscored the local connection and added excitement to the event. In fact, a photo of their performance is featured on the cover of the book, Blue Ridge Commons, by Kathryn Newfont (pictured right)

The collective expertise and action by WNCA’s members got the attention of the Forest Service Supervisor and after countless meetings over several years with the agency, the agency’s management plan for Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests was significantly amended in 1994. WNCA was influential in getting clearcutting dropped as a harvesting method, establishing buffers from logging within stream corridors, and designating protected old-growth tracts within timber management areas. These protections were innovative and the Nantahala-Pisgah National Forest Management Plan became a national model. 

Thanks to the hard work of WNCA founders, staff, forestry experts, and volunteers, the organization successfully went to bat (and hit a home run) for the continued wellbeing of Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests in its early years. And that work continues today as our Public Lands Team remains dedicated to the protection of these two beloved national forests through sound, science-backed management that perpetuates the unique biodiversity and honors the cultural and spiritual importance of these ancient mountain forests.